An evolutionary theory killer

A single base change refutes theistic evolution (2)

Announcing publication of a model that links the creation of quantized energy from changes in subatomic particles to biophysically constrained viral latency and sympatric speciation in all living genera.

Nutrient-dependent Pheromone-Controlled Ecological Adaptations: From Angstroms to Ecosystems

This angstroms to ecosystems model of ecological adaptation links nutrient energy-dependent epigenetic effects on base pairs and amino acid substitutions to pheromone-controlled changes in the microRNA/messenger RNA balance and chromosomal rearrangements via the physiology of reproduction in species from microbes to humans.

The invited review of nutritional epigenetics was returned without review and the preprint was posted 4 years ago as:

Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological adaptations: from atoms to ecosystems

The only significant change to the manuscript was a change in the title. Atoms to ecosystems became Angstroms to Ecosystems when quantized energy-dependent changes in angstroms were linked to ecological adaptation by what is known to all serious scientists in this 2014 parody.
All About that Base (Meghan Trainor Parody) 12/10/14
Repeat after them (and me): “… every angstrom is dynamic from the 5 prime to the three…”
See also the 2015 publication: Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA

DNA simultaneously exists in a largely inactive B-form with bases tucked in and protected and an active, highly varied structure with exposed bases.

See also: RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering

George Church and others may have been the first to place the naturally occurring biophysically constrained energy-dependent processes of ecological adaptations into the context of a patent. (It is extremely unusual for anyone to attempt to patent a naturally occurring process.) That explains why there is no patent litigation, which still plagues those who claimed to discover the CRISPR-Cas 9 innate immune system of bacteria, which biophysically constrains viral latency and prevents the degradation of messenger RNA that links the energy-dependent creation of bacteria to the virus-driven creation of archaea and L-forms. All biophysically constrained virus-driven pathology has since been placed back into the context of embryogenesis and the dynamics of energy-dependent gene expression at the level of single-cell resolution as if bacteria somehow evolved into humans.

See:

Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis
Single-cell mapping of gene expression landscapes and lineage in the zebrafish embryo
The dynamics of gene expression in vertebrate embryogenesis at single-cell resolution
Chronicling embryos, cell by cell, gene by gene
Reported as: How one cell gives rise to an entire body
See for comparison our section on molecular epigenetics in: From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior (1996)
Watch pseudoscientists continue to make ridiculous claims that fail to link the creation of biophysically constrained thermonuclear energy to autophagy and all biodiversity in the context of the cell biology game Cytosis and most of the forthcoming presentations during Schrödinger at 75 – The Future of Biology – September 2018.
Remember to note that at the end of the parody All About that Base, the research group politely refers to Neil deGrasse Tyson as a big ass (er, a bass). Try not to use the acronym ROTFLMAO in attempts to discuss what is known to all serious scientists with theorists.

5th-6th Sept 2018 Dublin, Ireland

A mental health problem at the highest level (3)

Summary: It has been 75 years since Erwin Schrödinger exposed the pseudoscientific nonsense of mutation-driven evolution in the lecture series that was published as What is Life? (1944)
The mental health of so-called science journalists must be addressed. Many of them seem to be pathological liars or, at best biologically uninformed science idiots who cannot link physics and chemistry from molecular epigenetics to all energy-dependent biodiversity on Earth.
The Biggest Myth In Quantum Physics by Ethan Siegel
Conclusion:

Take ourselves out of it, and all we have are the equations, the results, and the answers that the physical Universe gives. Physics cannot answer questions about “why” the Universe works the way it does; it can only explain how it works at all. If you’re interested in the fundamental nature of reality, ask the Universe questions about itself, and when it tells you its secrets, listen. Anything else that you layer atop it was put there by you, not by the Universe. Avoid that temptation, and you’ll never fall for the greatest myth about quantum physics: that it needs an interpretation at all.

The claim that quantum physics does not require a meaningful approach to explaining how energy is linked to all biodiversity in the context of interpretation of facts is ridiculous. Astrophysicist and author Ethan Siegel is the founder and primary writer of the blog “Starts With A Bang!” His books include Treknology and Beyond The Galaxy, Simply put, he is a biologically uniformed science idiot, like others who have failed to link their ridiculous theories to all biodiversity on Earth.
See for comparison: Refined control of cell stemness allowed animal evolution in the oxic realm
Reported as: Why animals diversified on Earth: Cancer research provides clues 

Just the presence of free oxygen is the result of some microbes finding a way of using sunlight to get energy. This was also a biological event.

The difference between how animals diversified and why they diversified is perfectly clear to all serious scientists. Energy is required!
McEwen et al (1964) linked the biological event from the creation of ATP to the creation of RNA and the creation of all biophysically constrained biodiversity. All other serious scientists have since followed his lead. Dobzhansky (1964) suggested that would happen.

The notion has gained some currency that the only worthwhile biology is molecular biology. All else is “bird watching” or “butterfly collecting.” Bird watching and butterfly collecting are occupations manifestly unworthy of serious scientists! I have heard a man whose official title happens to be Professor of Zoology declare to an assembly of his colleagues that “a good man cannot teach zoology. A good man can teach, of course, only molecular biology.

Such pronunciamentos can be dismissed as merely ridiculous. They are, however, caricatures of opinions entertained by some intelligent and reasonable people, whose views deserve an honest and careful consideration and analysis. Science must cope with new problems that arise and devise new approaches to old problems. Some lines of research become less profitable and less exciting and others more so.

The claims made in the fake news about Donald Trump’s mental state can now be linked to the mental heath of his antagonists who have never seen Dozhansky’s “light of evolution.”
Nothing in Biology Makes Any Sense Except in the Light of Evolution

For example, the so-called alpha chains of hemoglobin have identical sequences of amino acids in man and the chimpanzee, but they differ in a single amino acid (out of 141) in the gorilla (p. 127).”

The anti-entropic virucidal effect of sunlight was linked from ecological variation to ecological adaption in all living genera via the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in soil bacteria in: What is Life? (1944)

Indeed, in the case of higher animals we know the kind of orderliness they feed upon well enough, viz. the extremely well-ordered state of matter in more or less complicated organic compounds, which serve them as foodstuffs. After utilizing it they return it in a very much degraded form -not entirely degraded, however, for plants can still make use of it. (These, of course, have their most power supply of ‘negative entropy’ the sunlight.)

Seventy-four years later we have this example of human idiocy: Transposon-derived small RNAs triggered by miR845 mediate genome dosage response in Arabidopsis
Reported as: Counting chromosomes: Plant scientists solve a century-old mystery about reproduction (2018)

Today, a team of geneticists reveals a remarkable mechanism that enables plants to count their chromosomes, solving a century-old mystery.

Molecular mechanisms are energy-dependent. That’s no mystery. See: How an RNA gene silences a whole chromosome (2015)
Most science journalists have refused to inform themselves. They have not linked sunlight on contact with water to all energy-dependent biodiversity via the physiology of reproduction. For example, John Hewitt wrote:

If anything we know the Sky Fathers totally forgot about selenium during most of the design phase and then had to write him in at the end as a walk-on.

I was surprised by his sarcastic attack on religion and wrote:

Let’s not do this. See instead: A third of Americans don’t believe in evolution 

Those who do not believe in evolution understand that energy-dependent RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions must be linked from the physiology of reproduction to chromosomal rearrangements that biophysically constrain viral latency. If you can place your claim about selenium into the context of protection of all life on Earth from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA, we could discuss your claim. What is it?

John Hewitt wrote:

Sky Daddy likes cranberries so much he gave them sequence-level machinery for producing selenocysteine in their mitochondrial genome

I could not get  him to make sense. I wrote:

This is the type of cryptic sarcastic claim that kills people. Thousands  of them. Quit playing your silly games. Who are you calling “Sky  Daddy?”  Sequence-level molecular machinery does not exist outside the context of the creation of the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy. 

For comparison, Roger M. Pearlman wrote:

name one person you know that can explain Neo-Darwinian Theory (NDT) so it adds up, and how you know it adds up otherwise don’t knock the NDT adherents here as they are equally inept at making NDT add up as are the leading NDT scientists

How can anyone who wants to discuss NDT not know about this published work from 1973? Nothing in Biology Makes Any Sense Except in the Light of Evolution

… the so-called alpha chains of hemoglobin have identical sequences of amino acids in man and the chimpanzee, but they differ in a single amino acid (out of 141) in the gorilla.

The differences in the amino acid sequences are Koonin’s proof of evolution. See: A universal trend of amino acid gain and loss in protein evolution

Amino acid composition of proteins varies substantially between taxa and, thus, can evolve.

If the differences in the amino acid sequences are energy-dependent and RNA-mediated, NDT is the most ridiculous example of pseudoscientific nonsense that has every been touted by people who claim to be more intelligent than their primate ancestors.

Proof of that fact was published as: Modern diversification of the amino acid repertoire driven by oxygen

..we demonstrate an immediate survival benefit conferred by the enhanced redox reactivity of the modern amino acids tyrosine and tryptophan in oxidatively stressed cells. Our data indicate that in demanding building blocks with more versatile redox chemistry, biospheric molecular oxygen triggered the selective fixation of the last amino acids in the genetic code. Thus, functional rather than structural amino acid properties were decisive during the finalization of the universal genetic code.

Selective fixation of amino acid substitutions in organized genomes is energy-dependent and controlled by the physiology of reproduction.

That fact was reported as: Quantum Chemistry Solves The Question of Why Life Needs So Many Amino Acids 

If you were representing the amino acids as circles, they could be drawn as multiple concentric circles representing differing energy levels, rather than one single circle of the same chemical hardness and energy level – kind of like in the photo below.

Few people would make the connection from the amino acids as circles representing different energy levels to the claim that de Vries (1902) made when he invented the term mutation.

See:  What is Life? (1944)

But about forty years ago the Dutchman de Vries discovered that in the offspring even of thoroughly pure-bred stocks, a very small number of individuals, say two or three in tens of thousands, turn up with small but ‘jump-like’ changes, the expression ‘jump-like’ not meaning that the change is so very considerable, but that there is a discontinuity inasmuch as there are no intermediate forms between the unchanged and the few changed. De Vries called that a mutation. The significant fact is the discontinuity. It reminds a physicist of quantum theory -no intermediate energies occurring between two neighbouring energy levels. He would be inclined to call de Vries’s mutation theory, figuratively, the quantum theory of biology. We shall see later that this is much more than figurative. The mutations are actually due to quantum jumps in the gene molecule. But quantum theory was but two years old when de Vries first published his discovery, in 1902. Small wonder that it took another generation to discover the intimate connection!

It has been 75 years since Erwin Schrödinger exposed the pseudoscientific nonsense of mutation-driven evolution in the lecture series that was published as What is Life? (1944)

In the 1991 reprint edition, a forward by Roger Penrose who has co-authored with George F.R. Ellis, Stephen Hawking, Stuart Hameroff and others wrote:

How often do we still hear that quantum effects can have little relevance in the study of biology, or even that we eat food in order to gain energy?

It is worth repeating the claim the food energy is required to link quantum physics from quantum chemistry to quantum biology and quantum souls until all pseudoscientists lean the difference between a mutation and an amino acid substitution. Until then, the mental health problem at the highest level will be maintained at the highest level by the highest level of human idiocy every known to have eliminated common sense from consideration in the context of biologically based cause and effect.

For example, Darwin’s claims were based on “conditions of life” that required all organisms to find food and reproduce. Nothing was known about mutations, and even then Darwin could not possibly have been foolish enough to put them first in the context of natural selection for mutation-driven pathology.

See also: Analysis of experience-regulated transcriptome and imprintome during critical periods of mouse visual system development reveals spatiotemporal dynamics

Visual system development is light-experience dependent, which strongly implicates epigenetic mechanisms in light-regulated maturation. Among many epigenetic processes, genomic imprinting is an epigenetic mechanism….

…through which monoallelic gene expression occurs in a parent-of-origin-specific manner.

See: An Epigenetic Signature for Monoallelic Olfactory Receptor Expression
This explains why John Hewitt claims I’m providing BS. He is a biologically uninformed science journalist who does not understand the facts about light energy-dependent changes in organized genomes.
Any journalist who publishes anything like The vibrational theory of olfaction for the win should prepare to defend his claims in the context of serious scientists who know how energy must be linked to the vibrations and how the vibrations link quantum physics from quantum chemistry to quantum souls via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction and fixation of RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions.

Cytosis can be used to teach everything from base editing to RNA editing to everyone over age 10. They will learn how to link the creation of energy to biophysically constrained viral latency via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction.

Quantized energy-dependent viral trophism (2)

See first: Quantized energy-dependent viral trophism
Summary of Quantized energy-dependent viral trophism (2)
WTH*? The species evolved to F*- itself?
(H*eck) (*Fertilize)

Rapid genome shrinkage in a self-fertile nematode reveals sperm competition proteins Science  05 Jan 2018

…we compared chromosome-scale assemblies of the outcrossing nematode Caenorhabditis nigoni to its self-fertile sibling species…

The chromosome-scale assemblies extend across species to the fact that a difference in the diet of P. pacificus links its pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction from C. elegans to the morphological and behavioral phenotypes of a predatory nematode with teeth via chromosomal rearrangements.
Reported as: Worm species lost 7,000 genes after evolving to fertilize itself

“The fact that all the selfing species lost the mss genes suggests that these genes, which are very useful for worms having male-female sex, are harmful for worms that are no longer having sex with each other,” Haag said. “What we are seeing is an evolutionary snapshot of how a species fine-tunes its reproduction.”

See for comparison to what is known by serious scientists: From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior (1996) and System-wide Rewiring Underlies Behavioral Differences in Predatory and Bacterial-Feeding Nematodes (2013) and Estrogen receptor α polymorphism in a species with alternative behavioral phenotypes (2014).
For comparison to representations by pseudoscientists see Evolutionary resurrection of flagellar motility via rewiring of the nitrogen regulation system (2015)
The “Lost Sea Adventure” near Sweetwater, TN features fish that became blind within a few generations after they were placed into the water of the underground cave. The genes for phototaxis were no longer important to survival and the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA destroyed everything except the subatomic particles that might be required for reassembly in the context of a return to an environment with sufficient quantized energy as information from sunlight.
The Scopes Museum in Dayton, TN is also an eye-opening way to inform yourself about the difference between “evolution” and ecological adaptations, which must be linked from the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy and the food organisms eat to their pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction by facts, not by ridiculous theories with claims about species that automagically fine-tune energy-dependent pheromone-controlled reproduction.
For comparison: Scientific knowledge is drowning in a flood of research

A comic about the problems with the -omics

For comparison: Daniel L. Hurdiss and Ariane Briegel are like the brick-builders.
Role of enhanced receptor engagement in the evolution of a pandemic acute hemorrhagic conjunctivitis virus (2017)
Structure of bacterial cytoplasmic chemoreceptor arrays and implications for chemotactic signaling (2014)
 

Cytosis can be used to teach everything from base editing to RNA editing to everyone over age 10. They will learn how to link the creation of energy to biophysically constrained viral latency via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction.

From base editing to RNA editing (5)

 
 
Please try to link the maturity molecule to the evolution of mental illness outside the context of food energy-dependent base editing, RNA editing, RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions and the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction that stabilizes the organized genomes of all living genera via chromosomal rearrangements.
 

Then see:Oppositional COMT Val158Met effects on resting state functional connectivity in adolescents and adults

Dopamine-mediated behavioral are effected by COMT Val158Met function, which

“… is known to be affected by a functional single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in COMT (G-to-A base-pair substitution) leading to a methionine (Met) valine (Val) substitution at codons 108/158 (COMT Val158Met). Carriers of the Met allele have been found to display a fourfold decrease in enzymatic activity compared to Val allele carriers going along with an increase of prefrontal DA activity (Lachman et al. 1996; Lotta et al. 1995).”

The fact that one energy-dependent base-pair substitution and one RNA-mediated amino acid substitution can be linked to behavioral transitions via dopamine links epigenetics and genetics.

All serious scientists know that and some of them have been laughing at pseudoscientists for several decades. See from 10 December 2014:

See also: Structural diversity of supercoiled DNA

Tell the pseudoscientists and journalists who report ridiculous claims to stop treating us all as if we will always be biologically uninformed science idiots — unless that’s what you want to be when you grow up.

See for comparison: Cytosis: A Cell Biology Board Game

A board game taking place inside a human cell! Players compete to build enzymes, hormones and receptors and fend off attacking Viruses!

A rendering of how changes in an electron's motion (bottom view) alter the scattering of light (top view), as measured in a new experiment that scattered more than 500 photons of light from a single electron. Previous experiments had managed to scatter no more than a few photons at a time. Credit: Extreme Light Laboratory|University of Nebraska-Lincoln

From base editing to RNA editing

Base Editing Now Able to Convert Adenine-Thymine to Guanine-Cytosine

“Nature conveniently provides us with cytosine deaminase enzymes that operate on DNA,” Liu tells The Scientist.

The creation of quantized energy in sunlight links energy as information from electrons to ecosystems via the physiology of reproduction in all living genera. The claim that “Nature” provides us with cytosine deaminase enzymes makes it seem that the enzymes emerged and automagically evolved to become purposeful and meaningful in the context of ridiculous theories about mutation-driven evolution.
See for comparison: All about that base (video parody)
See also: RNA Editing Possible with CRISPR-Cas13

Introducing specific sequence changes into RNA molecules could allow researchers to answer questions about alternative splicing mechanisms, translation, and even editing, he says. “There’s a lot of scope.”

The entirety of that scope was addressed in the context of energy-dependent RNA-mediated cell type differentiation in our section on molecular epigenetics from this 1996 Hormones and Behavior review. From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior
Small intranuclear proteins also participate in generating alternative splicing techniques of pre-mRNA and, by this mechanism, contribute to sexual differentiation in at least two species, Drosophila melanogaster and Caenorhabditis elegans (Adler and Hajduk, 1994; de Bono, Zarkower, and Hodgkin, 1995; Ge, Zuo, and Manley, 1991; Green, 1991; Parkhurst and Meneely, 1994; Wilkins, 1995; Wolfner, 1988). That similar proteins perform functions in humans suggests the possibility that some human sex differences may arise from alternative splicings of otherwise identical genes.
All biophysically constrained RNA-mediated energy-dependent cell type differentiation has since been linked from the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction to supercoiled DNA via the fixation of amino acid substitutions and chromosomal rearrangements.
The facts about the amino acid substitutions in the context of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance link electrons to ecosystems via the cryo-EM technology that won the 2017 Nobel Prize in Chemistry.
See: Chemists know (video parody)
See also:

Feedback loops link quantized energy as information to biophysically constrained RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry. Light induced energy-dependent changes link angstroms to ecosystems from classical physics to chemistry/chirality and to molecular epigenetics/autophagy. The National Microbiome Initiative links microbial quorum sensing to the physiology of reproduction via endogenous RNA interference and chromosomal rearrangements. The rearrangements link energy-dependent fixed amino acid substitutions to the Precision Medicine Initiative via genome wide inferences of natural selection. This detailed representation of energy-dependent natural selection for codon optimality links biologically- based cause and effect from G protein-coupled receptors to RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions and the functional structure of supercoiled DNA. Energy-dependent polycombic ecological adaptations are manifested in supercoiled DNA. Chromosomal inheritance links the adaptations from morphological phenotypes to healthy longevity via behavioral phenotypes. For contrast, virus-driven energy theft is the link from messenger RNA degradation to negative supercoiling, constraint breaking mutations, and hecatombic evolution. The viral hecatomb links transgenerational epigenetic inheritance from archaea to Zika virus-damaged DNA, which typically is repaired by endogenous RNA interference and fixation of RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions in organized genomes

Can protein folding chemistry be understood by theorists?

Excerpt: The researchers believe their discovery dovetails with their research on how tumor viruses and cancer mutations change a cell’s DNA structure and organization to cause uncontrolled cell growth.
Aye group discovers avenue for precision cancer treatment

One challenge is that multiple variations, or isoforms, of the same protein can all catalyze the same cellular function, “but the nuances of biology rest in how individual isoforms are regulated,” Aye said.

Natural selection for energy-dependent codon optimality regulates the creation of isoforms and all biodiversity via links from RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions in supercoiled DNA to chromosomal inheritance.

Protein folding: Much more intricate than we thought

All protein folding chemistry is energy-dependent and RNA-mediated. It must link chirality to autophagy and the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction or it cannot link quantum physics to quantum souls via what organisms eat in the context of niche construction.
See also: New Imaging Technique Overturns Longstanding Textbook Model of DNA Folding

The researchers believe their discovery dovetails with their research on how tumor viruses and cancer mutations change a cell’s DNA structure and organization to cause uncontrolled cell growth.

Energy-dependent protein folding chemistry is no more intricate than it was when we detailed everything known about RNA-mediated cell type differentiation in this 1996 Hormones and Behavior review. From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior

See also: Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model

THIS MODEL DETAILS HOW CHEMICAL ECOLOGY DRIVES ADAPTIVE EVOLUTION VIA: (1) ecological niche construction, (2) social niche construction, (3) neurogenic niche construction, and (4) socio-cognitive niche construction.

See also: Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological adaptations: from atoms to ecosystems

This atoms to ecosystems model of ecological adaptations links nutrient-dependent epigenetic effects on base pairs and amino acid substitutions to pheromone-controlled changes in the microRNA / messenger RNA balance and chromosomal rearrangements. The nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled changes are required for the thermodynamic regulation of intracellular signaling, which enables biophysically constrained nutrient-dependent protein folding; experience-dependent receptor-mediated behaviors, and organism-level thermoregulation in ever-changing ecological niches and social niches. Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological, social, neurogenic and socio-cognitive niche construction are manifested in increasing organismal complexity in species from microbes to man. Species diversity is a biologically-based nutrient-dependent morphological fact and species-specific pheromones control the physiology of reproduction.

See also: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception

See for comparison: What the ctenophore says about the evolution of intelligence

The ctenophore was already known for having a relatively advanced nervous system; but these first experiments by Moroz showed that its nerves were constructed from a different set of molecular building blocks – different from any other animal – using ‘a different chemical language’, says Moroz: these animals are ‘aliens of the sea’.

Moroz tries and fails to recover from decades of touting the pseudoscientific nonsense of neo-Darwinian evolution.  See: Independent origins of neurons and synapses: insights from ctenophores

The possibility of secondary loss of neurons and synapses in the Porifera/Placozoa clades is a highly unlikely and less parsimonious scenario.

The virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA has been linked to the secondary loss of G protein-coupled receptors that link multisensory input from the sense of smell in bacteria to our visual perception of mass and energy in the context of the space-time continuum.
See also: Viral Genome Junk Is Bunk

So, where do viruses come from that essentially share the same sequences as those found in their host genomes? Perhaps the evolutionists have placed the cart before the horse on this issue, as proposed by several creationist scientists.4,6 In fact, in an ironic twist, the evidence mentioned above indicates that viruses likely arose from their hosts and not the other way around. As molecular biologist and biochemist Peter Borger notes, “The most parsimonious answer is: the RNA viruses got their genes from their hosts.”6

The possibility that the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA causes the secondary loss of neurons and synapses in the Porifera/Placozoa clades is the most likely and most parsimonious scenario. Neo-Darwinian theorists and others who have failed to link the sun’s anti-entropic virucidal energy to the biophysically constrained physiology of reproduction and all biodiversity via the chemistry of protein folding are forced to continue to ignore all experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect. Their only alternative is to invent new terms for “microRNA,” since energy-dependent changes in the microRNA/messenger balance have linked the physiology of reproduction from chromosomal rearrangements to viral latency and all biodiversity.
See also:  Gut viruses tied to potentially deadly complication of bone marrow transplant

…the onset of GvHD appeared to trigger the late awakening of these covert viruses, laying to rest a longstanding chicken-and-egg debate: which comes first, viral infection or GvHD? The researchers conclude that much of the viral flare they saw is due to reactivation of latent gut infections following transplantation.

The link from gut bacteria to reactivation of latent gut infections following transplantation links a change in the energy-dependent microRNA/messenger RNA balance to hematopoiesis and.cell type differentiation in all vertebrates and vertebrates.
 See also:
Mysterious children’s neurological disease is traced to a single error in one gene

The researchers found in all patients the same spontaneously occurring, non-inherited genetic change in a gene (named “UBTF”) responsible for ribosomal RNA formation.
 

The de novo creation of RNA is energy-dependent. No disease can be traced to a single gene outside the context of the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA that causes the pathology.

See: Oligogenic basis of isolated gonadotropin-releasing hormone deficiency

The deficiency links the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA from a single gene to every aspect of vertebrate morphology and behavior via GnRH.

The de novo energy-dependent creation of RNA has been linked to GrRH since 1964.

The synthesis of RNA in isolated thymus nuclei is ATP dependent.

I reiterate:  Next we will learn that “Nothing in Biology Makes Sense…” outside the context of food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled RNA-mediated ecological adaptations.

NgAgo Paper Retracted

“[W]hen it comes to biology, answers are often not definitive. And when it comes to replication studies, the one thing we know is that it takes time,” it says. “In the case of NgAgo, the time has come and the data have spoken.”

Earlier today, I mentioned to my friend, Jo Rockafellor, that Bruce McEwen told me, in 1992, my model could not be validated without starting from gene activation in gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) neurons. After learning from Donald Pfaff that Robert L. Moss might know something important, “Bob” Moss and I became friends. He once told me, “you know how it works, write the book.”
 
If you think I am name-dropping, you are right. These are the people that others must learn from or they are not likely to learn anything about energy-dependent biophysically constrained RNA-mediated cell type differentiation.
 
Another line of experimental evidence links publication of The Scent of Eros: Mysteries of Odor in Human Sexuality (1995/2002), from Martha McClintock’s works to the claim made by Denise Chen when she introduced me to Wen Zhou.

Denise claimed that my book was responsible for her interest in the study of olfaction, and Wen Zhou has since linked quantum physics to quantum souls.

When someone like Moroz claims that “The possibility of secondary loss of neurons and synapses in the Porifera/Placozoa clades is a highly unlikely and less parsimonious scenario.” he attests to the ignorance of several generations of pseudoscientists who failed to ask how and when the energy-dependent de novo creation of RNA occurred. Instead, they link the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA to all biodiversity via mutations and natural selection.

That, is foolish. See: Cytosis: A Cell Biology Board Game

A board game taking place inside a human cell! Players compete to build enzymes, hormones and receptors and fend off attacking Viruses!

Cytosis

New Testament Book Cover Refutes Theistic Evolution

Goats, bookworms, a monk’s kiss: Biologists reveal the hidden history of ancient gospels

Collins already had developed a method to identify ancient species by differences in the amino acid sequences of collagen and other proteins preserved in fossils.

See: Protein power by Robert F. Service

…methods to sequence amino acids lag behind DNA sequencing.

The report of 300 million year old proteins is based on ridiculous theories that failed to include what was known about food energy-dependent RNA-mediated fixation of amino acid substitutions.
Natural selection for energy-dependent codon optimality links the pheromone-controlled fixation of the substitutions to cell type differentiation in all individuals of all living genera.
Collins has since used the method he developed to recover amino acid sequences that reveal which animal skin was used for the leather cover for the Gospel of Luke.

Collins so-called revelation about the species-specificity of amino acid sequences was reported in Dobzhansky (1964) and again in 1973.

Pseudoscientists have ignored this fact:

…the so-called alpha chains of hemoglobin have identical sequences of amino acids in man and the chimpanzee, but they differ in a single amino acid (out of 141) in the gorilla (p. 127).” — Dobzhansky (1973)

The sequences of amino acids link what animals eat to the food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled morphological and behavioral biodiversity manifested in every species on Earth. See: Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction

See also: Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological adaptations: from atoms to ecosystems

This atoms to ecosystems model of ecological adaptations links nutrient-dependent epigenetic effects on base pairs and amino acid substitutions to pheromone-controlled changes in the microRNA / messenger RNA balance and chromosomal rearrangements. The nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled changes are required for the thermodynamic regulation of intracellular signaling, which enables biophysically constrained nutrient-dependent protein folding; experience-dependent receptor-mediated behaviors, and organism-level thermoregulation in ever-changing ecological niches and social niches. Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological, social, neurogenic and socio-cognitive niche construction are manifested in increasing organismal complexity in species from microbes to man.The species-specific link from food energy-dependent changes in base pairs to the fixation of amino acid substitutions in supercoiled DNA protects all organized genomes from the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA.

See also:  Cytosis: A Cell Biology Board Game A board game taking place inside a human cell! Players compete to build enzymes, hormones and receptors and fend off attacking Viruses!

See also: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception reported as: Odors Alter Subjective Time Experience 

The energy-dependent de novo creation of the sense of smell links food odors and natural selection for codon optimality to the physiology of reproduction. Feedback loops link the sense of smell in bacteria to all biodiversity via the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction.

Metaphorically, the sense of smell is like a time machine that links our experiences from the past to our behaviors throughout life. Experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect links the creation of the sense of smell to representations of food energy-dependent pheromone-controlled biodiversity in invertebrates to vertebrates. The fact that bookworms are invertebrates has aroused interest in the context of the Gospel of Luke.

Goats, bookworms, a monk’s kiss: Biologists reveal the hidden history of ancient gospels (revisited)

Others were more interested in the bookworms. Hedges announced that the wormholes he measured in the Gospel of Luke were 1.3 millimeters in diameter, suggesting that they were made by Anobium punctatum, a northern European beetle. That would confirm that the book was made in the United Kingdom or northern Europe, rather than in southern Europe. The DNA of bookworms “can provide clues as to when and where objects such as books originated and were transported,” Hedges says.

The energy-dependent creation of RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions in different species links experimental evidence of creation to the Dawn of Creation.

The New Testament Book Cover provides experimental evidence of how our visual perception of mass and energy is linked to the space-time continuum via olfaction and representations in Biblical Genesis that link energy as information at the “Dawn of Creation” for comparison to claims and theories about the emergence of energy and the evolution of all biodiversity.

See also: Researchers may have solved origin-of-life conundrum by Robert F. Service

… a pair of simple compounds, which would have been abundant on early Earth, can give rise to a network of simple reactions that produce the three major classes of biomolecules—nucleic acids, amino acids, and lipids—needed for the earliest form of life to get its start.

The origin of life is energy-dependent and RNA-mediated. Robert F. Service seems to be perfectly poised to prevent the dissemination of accurate information about how the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA is linked from mutations to all pathology.
He has failed to link the energy-dependent creation of nucleic acids, amino acids, and lipids to the creation of the innate immune system and the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in all living genera, which protects all organized genomes from the virus-driven energy theft that links mutations to all pathology.
Simply put, in the context of the Gospel of Luke, Robert F. Service has failed to link any aspect of biologically-based cause and effect from amino acid substitutions to biodiversity via supercoiled DNA.

That may explain why on 2/17/16, I received a message from Bob Grant who claimed to moderate reader comments on posts at www.the-scientist.com.

He claimed that many of my posts were off-topic and excessively long, and asked me to limit both the length and the focus of my comments in the future. He warned “If you continue to post long, rambling, or incoherent comments, I’ll be forced to bar you from our discussion board, something I do not want to do.”

I’ve been banned from many discussions, and consistently see why I am banned. Discussions of pseudoscientific nonsense prevails. For example, see:

First Support for a Physics Theory of Life Thanks to Oleksander Savsunenko for bringing this to my attention.

Take chemistry, add energy, get life. The first tests of Jeremy England’s provocative origin-of-life hypothesis are in, and they appear to show how order can arise from nothing.

My comment to Quanta Magazine

See for comparison: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28334302

They link the energy-dependent creation of the sense of smell in bacteria to our visual perception of mass and energy in the context of the space-time continuum and everything known to serious scientists about RNA-mediated cell type differentiation via the physiology of reproduction.

Compared to the claims of Jeremy England, they start with Darwin’s food energy-dependent “conditions of life.”

Richard Feynman commented on the “conditions of life” and linked Jeremy England’s claims to examples of “human idiocy.” No one will complain that Jeremy England is an idiot (i.e., someone with no professional expertise), but everyone should remember that he has no professional expertise that can be linked to biologically-based top-down causation.

See: Food energy https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=roX2NXDUTsM
Richard Feynman, complains about all the different units that are used to measure the single concept of Energy.

Re: “Take chemistry, add energy, get life.” But do not tell a serious scientist about your theory.
And, do not expect those who moderate discussions to understand anything a serious scientist claims.
My follow-up to Bob Grant, who did not reply:

I am left with this impression.
I could respond to Roy Niles’ comment by linking virus-perturbed protein folding chemistry from loss of olfactory receptor genes to pathology in species from nematodes to humans. But, you might ban me.
The information comes from Cori Bargmann’s group, and she married Richard Axel, who shared the 2004 Nobel prize in Medicine with Linda Buck. Linda Buck extended our 1996 Hormones and Behavior review of RNA-mediated cell type differentiation across species from microbes to man when she co-authored: Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction
I know a few others who have since linked viruses to perturbed thermodynamic cycles of RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry via amino acid substitutions but you’re not likely to be hearing from them, either. Eugene Daev and Anna Di Cosmo are among those who people like Roy Niles are indirectly responsible for censoring. Simply put anyone who understood our claims in the section on molecular epigenetics from our 1996 review, has made progress akin to the progress of my mentor, Bruce McEwen, whose group just linked a single nutrient-dependent RNA-mediated amino acid substitution from stress to life history transitions in human behavior via the mouse model and BDNF Val66Met. Stress dynamically regulates behavior and glutamatergic gene expression in hippocampus by opening a window of epigenetic plasticity

From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior

Most polymaths live in a world of their own because others don’t want to learn enough to catch up, and the polymaths are too far ahead to explain what they have known for several decades.
A 6-hour long conversation with Bruce McEwen in 1991 led to my breakfast conversation in 1995 with Gene Garfield, which is when he learned enough about cell type differentiation from me and his octogenarian friend “Bill” Turner, to comment on my book in the year it was published. Greg Bear linked the information from my works to his stories about the evolution of a new human sub-species. Evolution rising from the grave; Living with the Neanderthals
I’m not sure if “The Scientist” will help others continue to move forward if you think my comments are off topic — and ban me when I try to elaborate on the link to the topic of RNA-mediated cell type differentiation for comparison to the thoughts of others about mutation-driven evolution.  I lost any linear thinking skills I might have had before writing the book, and without the help of my co-author — it wouldn’t have made sense even to Gene.
Thanks for the opportunity to vent my frustrations,
James V. Kohl

Medical laboratory scientist (ASCP)
Independent researcher

http://rna-mediated.com/

 

A rendering of how changes in an electron's motion (bottom view) alter the scattering of light (top view), as measured in a new experiment that scattered more than 500 photons of light from a single electron. Previous experiments had managed to scatter no more than a few photons at a time. Credit: Extreme Light Laboratory|University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Energy-dependent physical and biophysical constraints (10)

Summary: The entire evolution of the microbial world and the virus world, and the interaction between microbes and viruses and other life forms have been left out of the Modern Synthesis…— Eugene Koonin
My comment: Viruses are not life forms. They steal the quantized energy that links sunlight to viral latency in the context of everything known to all serious scientists about the fact that Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction
See for comparison: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception Energy as information links the sense of smell in bacteria to our visual perception of energy and mass in the context of the space-time continuum and food odors that link the physiology of reproduction in bacteria to the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction and biophysically constrained viral latency in all living genera.
—————————————————————

Energy-dependent physical and biophysical constraints (9)

2010 A single amino acid substitution confers enhanced methylation activity of mammalian Dnmt3b on chromatin DNA

…the I662N substitution in mammalian Dnmt3b conferred enhanced chromatin DNA methylation activity and contributed to functional adaptation in the epigenetic system.

Energy-dependent amino acid substitutions link what organisms eat to their pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction and chromosomal rearrangements that have been linked to all biodiversity via the sense of smell in bacteria and quorum sensing.
2013 Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model

CONCLUSION:

An environmental drive evolved from that of nutrient ingestion in unicellular organisms to that of pheromone-controlled socialization in insects. In mammals, food odors and pheromones cause changes in hormones such as LH, which has developmental affects on pheromone-controlled sexual behavior in nutrient-dependent reproductively fit individuals across species of vertebrates.

2013 The major antigenic changes of the influenza virus are primarily caused by a single amino acid near the receptor binding site.
2017 Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention

There are at least four sources of R mutations in normal cells: quantum effects on base pairing (30), mistakes made by polymerases (31), hydrolytic deamination of bases (32), and damage by endogenously produced reactive oxygen species or other metabolites (33).

2015 Visualizing transient Watson-Crick-like mispairs in DNA and RNA duplexes

…their covalently bonded 13C/15N nuclei were assigned using heteronuclear single/multiple quantum coherence correlation experiments (HSQC or HMQC).

2017 Nature does not rely on long-lived electronic quantum coherence for photosynthetic energy transfer

…/the observed extremely fast decoherence should be viewed as general, bringing to question any significant quantum coherent transport contributions to photosynthesis.

2017 Recent progress on the effects of microRNAs and natural products on tumor epithelial-mesenchymal transition
My summary: Two researches in NATURE denied the role that microRNAs play epithelial-mesenchymal transition in tumors and their denial of everything known about food energy-dependent biophysically constrained pheromone-contolled biodiversity is discussed in this review. See for comparison the section on Regulation of miRNA on EMT in tumors
The role of miRNA/ZEB in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, in breast cancer, in lung cancer, in pancreatic cancer and in bladder cancer was anticipated in reports by serious scientists such as the late Eshel Ben-Jacob. See: MicroRNA-based regulation of epithelial–hybrid–mesenchymal fate determination, which was reported as:

They found that there is a molecular “on” and “off” switch that cancer cells use to determine their fate. Evidently, there is an on or off state for metastasis (migration), but also a third possibility, according to this recently-discovered molecular data.

The researchers discovered that there was an intermediate function, which is termed a “ternary,” or three-way switch. This function relates to the fact that ZEB has the ability to turn itself on due to a positive feedback system. This allows a cell to keep intermediate levels of all four proteins required for the switch. Ben-Jacob notes that the hybrid, or partially on-off state, also supports cancer metastasis by enabling collective cell migration and by imparting stem-cell properties that help migrating cancer cells evade the immune system and anticancer therapies.

See also: Stability of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype

Our results suggest that partial EMT, i.e. a hybrid E/M phenotype, need not be ‘metastable’, and strengthen the emerging notion that partial EMT, but not necessarily a complete EMT, is associated with aggressive tumor progression.

The food energy-dependent stability of the hybrid epithelial/mesenchymal phenotype has been linked from photosynthesis to the creation of energy-dependent microRNAs in plants and in animals via what has been known to all serious scientists about the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction in bacteria.
See:
2003 Bacterial self-organization: co-enhancement of complexification and adaptability in a dynamic environment
2006 Seeking the foundations of cognition in bacteria: From Schrödinger’s negative entropy to latent information
2009 Learning from Bacteria about Natural Information Processing with my emphasis

Focusing on the energy, matter, and thermodynamic imbalances provided by the environment, Schrodinger proposed that life required the consumption of negative entropy, that is, the use of thermodynamic imbalances in the environment. From the perspective of thermodynamics, each bacterium can be viewed as a complex system that is composed of an “engine” that uses imbalances in the environment to do work, and a “machine” that uses this energy (to act against the natural course of entropy increase) for the synthesis of organic substances.13 A third information-processing system is also needed for the coordination and synchronization of the functioning of the engine and the machine. Namely, a living cell is analogous to a complex man-made cybernetic system, or a “chimera,” composed of information processing systems and of at least two thermodynamic elements. In addition, using the outer membrane, cells sense the environment.

We proposed that, besides “negative entropy,” organisms sense the environment to extract latent embedded information.13 By latent information we refer to data embedded in the environment that, once processed cognitively, initiates change in the organism’s function or behavior. Information induces changes; hence it can be used to generate an internal condensed description (model or usable information) of the environment, which guides the organism’s functioning.

Conclusion: Olfaction Warps Visual Time Perception Energy as information links the sense of smell in bacteria to our visual perception of energy and mass in the context of the space-time continuum and food odors that link the physiology of reproduction in bacteria to the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction in all living genera.
See for comparison (Koonin is a co-author): On the Origin of Reverse Transcriptase-Using CRISPR-Cas Systems and Their Hyperdiverse, Enigmatic Spacer Repertoires
…another cause of the lack of detectable protospacers is likely to be the existence of a virtually untapped pool of mobile genetic elements that, at any given time, are not represented in a given environment (10). This paucity of spacer matches is conceivably explained by the vastness and diversity of viromes…
Biologically uninformed evolutionary theorists have failed to link the anti-entropic virucidal energy of the sun to all biodiversity and failed to link the virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA to all pathology via changes in the microRNA/messenger RNA balance. The release of the game “Cytosis” in September (2017) will make all theorists appear to be among the biologically uninformed science idiots who invented ridiculous theories in attempts to explain away Darwin’s “conditions of life.”
See: Cytosis: A Cell Biology Board Game 
A board game taking place inside a human cell! Players compete to build enzymes, hormones and receptors and fend off attacking Viruses!
See also the comments on: Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention
For example:  2017 Jul 28 06:45 a.m. (research profile) challenges the “bad luck” theory of cancer.

Cancer etiology: assumptions lead to erroneous conclusion

The authors claim that cancer is caused and driven by mutations, and that two-thirds of the mutations required for cancer are caused by unavoidable errors arising during DNA replication. The first claim is based on the somatic mutation theory. The second claim is based on a highly positive correlation between the lifetime number of stem cell divisions in a tissue and the risk of cancer in that tissue, and on their method for estimating the proportion of mutations that result from heredity (H mutations), environmental factors (E mutations) and unavoidable errors arising during DNA replication (R mutations). These claims raise several questions:

1. Sequencing studies have found zero mutations in the genes of a variable proportion of different cancer types (see, e.g., https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dju405 and references therein). If cancer is caused by mutations in driver genes, could the authors explain what causes these cancers with zero mutations? Could the authors use their method for estimating the proportion of cancer risk that is preventable and unpreventable in people with tumors lacking driver gene mutations?

2. Environmental factors are known to affect stem cell division rates. According to IARC, drinking very hot beverages probably causes esophageal cancer (Group 2A). If you drink something hot enough to severely damage the cells lining the esophagus, the stem cells located in deeper layers have to divide to produce new cells to replace the damaged cells. These stem cell divisions, triggered by an environmental factor, will lead to mutations arising during DNA replication. However, these mutations are avoidable if you do not drink very hot beverages. Should these mutations be counted as environmental mutations (H mutations) or as unavoidable mutations arising during DNA replication (R mutations)?

3. The authors’ work is based on the somatic mutation theory. This theory is primarily supported by the idea that cancer incidence increases exponentially with age. Since our cells are known to accumulate mutations throughout life, the accumulation of driver gene mutations in our cells would perfectly explain why the risk of cancer increases until death. However, it is now well established that cancer incidence does not increase exponentially with age for some cancers (acute lymphoblastic leukemia, testicular cancer, cervical cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, thyroid cancer, bone cancer, etc). It is also well known that cancer incidence decreases late in life for many cancer types (lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, etc). For example, according to SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2014, men in their 80s have approximately half the risk of developing prostate cancer than men in their 70s. The somatic mutation theory, which is the basis for this article, does not explain why the lifetime accumulation of driver gene mutations in the cells of many tissues is not translated into an increase in cancer incidence throughout life. Are the authors’ conclusions applicable to all cancers or only to those few cancers in which incidence increases exponentially with age until death?

4. The authors estimate that 23% of the mutations required for the development of pancreatic cancer are associated with environmental and hereditary factors; the rest (77%) are mutations arising during DNA replication. However, Notta et al. recently found that 65.4% of pancreatic tumors develop catastrophic mitotic events that lead to mutations associated with massive genomic rearrangements (https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19823). In other words, Notta et al. demonstrate that cell division not only leads to mutations arising during DNA replication, but also to mutations arising during mitosis. For this cancer type, the authors could introduce a fourth source of mutations, and estimate the proportion of mutations arising during mitosis (M mutations) and re-estimate those arising during DNA replication (R mutations). Alternatively, they could reanalyze their raw data without assuming that the parameters “stem cell divisions” and ”DNA replication mutations” are interchangeable. Cell division, process by which a cell copies and separates its cellular components to finally split into two cells, can lead to mutations occurring during DNA replication, but also to other cancer-promoting errors, such as chromosome aberrations arising during mitosis, errors in the distribution of cell-fate determinants between the daughter cells, and failures to restore physical interactions with other tissue components. Would the authors’ conclusions stand without assuming that the parameters “stem cell divisions” and ”DNA replication mutations” are interchangeable?

5. The authors report a striking correlation between the number of stem cell divisions in a tissue and the risk of cancer in that tissue. They do not report any correlation between the number of mutations in a tissue and the risk of cancer in that tissue; in fact, these parameters are not correlated (see. e.g., https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19768). In addition, the authors discuss that most of the mutations required for cancer are a consequence, not a cause, of the division of stem cells. So, why do the authors use their correlation to say that cancer is caused by the accumulation of mutations in driver genes instead of saying that cancer is caused by the accumulation of cell divisions in stem cells?

For references and additional information see: Comment on ‘Stem cell divisions, somatic mutations, cancer etiology, and cancer prevention’ DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.28889.21602 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318744904; also https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/201707.0074/v1/download

See also: Miguel Lopez-Lazaro
My comment: Like him, others from a new generation of researchers, will no longer tolerate the pseudoscienitfic nonsense touted by evolutionary theorists and “Big Bang” cosmologists who know nothing about natural selection for energy-dependent codon optimality, which links the physiology of reproduction to biophysically constrained viral latency.

amino acid homeostasis

Energy-dependent pheromone-controlled entropy (4)

Solar-driven reforming of lignocellulose to H2 with a CdS/CdOx photocatalyst
Reported as: Scientists harness solar power to produce clean hydrogen from biomass
They claim that the rigid structure of nature’s equivalent to armored concrete evolved to protect plants and trees from degradation. They don’t make claims about what might cause the degradation.
They start with the likelihood that degradation automagically occurs. That led them to design a combination of catalyst and solution that mimics how the anti-entropic energy of sunlight is linked to the potential of hydrogen, which is referred to as pH. Their design allowed them to extract the potential of hydrogen in the context of naturally occurring hydrogen-atom transfer in DNA base pairs in solution. They placed their simple design into the context of the evolution of armored concrete.

Pieces of wood, paper and leaves were placed in test tubes and exposed to solar light.

Their sunlight-powered extraction technology reminds me Schrodinger’s (1944) inference. Schrodinger seemed to suggest that someone designed an anti-entropic force, when he attempted to support the answer to his question: “What is Life.”
Theosophically, the God of the Holy Bible and Schrodinger both seemed to be saying that God might have used “the force” as if it came from the “Star Wars” series of movies. The sun could be like other stars and brave souls used “the force” to protect other people from harm.
In the context of the movies series, God, Schrodinger, and all serious scientists have detailed every aspect of how the conserved molecular mechanisms of RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry protect all organized genomes from virus-driven energy theft and genomic entropy.
For comparison, their design enables the production of clean hydrogen from unprocessed biomass. They think they have created a viable alternative to high temperature gasification, which appears to be a renewable means of hydrogen production. It could be compared to God’s way of ensuring that food energy is linked to the physiology of reproduction via endogenous RNA interference and to all biodiversity via energy-dependent biophysically constrained supercoiled DNA. The supercoiled DNA is the linked to chromosomal rearrangements that protect organisms from evolving into something different than their ancestors.
However, their design runs in reverse. They are taking the hydrogen energy out instead of putting it into supercoiled DNA via what is known about quantum physics and how subatomic particles must be linked to the energy-dependent de novo creation of all biodiversity and/or the virus-driven energy theft that appears to be destroying it.

For comparison, this claim links the anti-entropic virucidal energy of sunlight on contact with water from the creation of nucleic acid precursors to all healthy longevity and biodiversity on Earth via the physiology of reproduction.
Virus decomposition provides an important contribution to benthic deep-sea ecosystem functioning

Viruses proliferate at the expense of their hosts. …approximately 25% of viruses released by lysed prokaryotic cells are decomposed at fast rates. We show that… virus decomposition provides a major source of labile organic compounds able to sustain the microbial food webs and nutrient cycling at a global scale.

If you are a theorist who still does not know where the anti-entropic force comes from that prevents virus-driven energy theft from destroying all life on earth, find out more about how the virucidal effect of sunlight feeds the world in the context of the nutrient energy-dependent pheromone controlled physiology of reproduction.
It may be too late for you to become a serious scientist, but at least you will not continue to be one of the pseudoscientists who had us outnumbered since the time neo-Darwinism was invented.
See for an example of a pseudoscientist:
7/25/13
Jay R. Feierman: Variation is not nutrient availability and the something that is doing the selecting is not the individual organism. A feature of an educated person is to realize what they do not know. Sadly, you don’t know that you have an incorrect understanding [of] Darwinian biological evolution.

Light-induced-conformer-intercoversion-of-hydrogen-bond

Dobzhansky 1973 and precision medicine (5)

See: Dobzhansky 1973 and precision medicine (4)

Microenvironmental autophagy promotes tumour growth

…non-cell-autonomous autophagy is induced both in the tumour microenvironment and systemically… transformed cells engage surrounding normal cells as active and essential microenvironmental contributors to early tumour growth through nutrient-generating autophagy.

Non-cell autonomous autophagy links non-random natural selection for codon optimality from the nutrient energy-dependent pherormone-controlled physiology of reproduction to biophysically constrained RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry via fixation of amino acid substitutions in supercoiled DNA.

The supercoiled DNA links metabolic networks to genetic networks and chromosomal rearrangements to the transgenerational epigenetic inheritance of morphological phenotypes and behavioral phenotypes. Chromosomal inheritance links the 1933 Nobel Prize winning works of Thomas Hunt Morgan and Erwin Schrodinger to the works of 2016 Nobel Laureates Ben Feringa and Yoshinori Ohsumi.  Collectively, their Nobel Prizes explain why Richard Axel and Linda Buck won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2004 for detailing how the de novo creation of G protein-coupled receptors was linked to healthy longevity in all living genera.

See also: Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction

It has become obvious that light induced changes in chirality must be linked from chemotaxis and phototaxis to all biodiversity via the pheromone-controlled physiology of reproduction.

Serious scientists start with the anti-entropic virucidal energy of UV light, and link energy to behavior.

See: CRYPTOCHROME mediates behavioral executive choice in response to UV light 

See also: Fast Evolution Confirms Creationist Theory

Up-to-date research shows that they may employ dozens of mechanisms including epigenetic, hybridization, cryptic variation, behavioral changes, unreduced gametes, directed crossover, regulated micro-RNAs or RNA splicing, horizontal gene transfer, and even modulation of an organism’s microbiota. None of these mechanisms require a struggle for life and death!

See also this easy to read accurate representation of facts about healthy longevity compared to virus-driven pathology. Jeffrey P. Tomkins, Ph.D. 2015. Viral Genome Junk Is Bunk. Acts & Facts. 44 (4).
See also: Nothing in Biology Makes Any Sense Except in the Light of Evolution

Cytochrome C is an enzyme that plays an important role in the metabolism of aerobic cells. It is found in the most diverse organisms, from man to molds.

E. Margoliash, W. M. Fitch, and others have compared the amino acid sequences in cytochrome C in different branches of the living world. Most significant similarities as well as differences have been brought to light. The cytochrome C of different orders of mammals and birds differ in 2 to 17 amino acids, classes of vertebrates in 7 to 38, and vertebrates and insects in 23 to 41; and animals differ from yeasts and molds in 56 to 72 amino acids. Fitch and Margoliash prefer to express their findings in what are called “minimal mutational distances.” It has been mentioned above that different amino acids are coded by different triplets of nucleotides in DNA of the genes; this code is now known.

See also:Combating Evolution to Fight Disease
For comparison see: Scientists planning their own march in Washington

There are certain things that we accept as facts with no alternatives,” according to the site. “The Earth is becoming warmer due to human action. The diversity of life arose by evolution. … An American government that ignores science to pursue ideological agendas endangers the world.

Anyone who accepts the claim that the diversity of life arose by evolution is not a serious scientist. Pseudoscientists who sign up for the march should repeatedly march themselves into a corner for a “time-out” until they learn not to throw temper tantrums or make claims that cannot be supported by experimental evidence of biologically-based facts. All serious scientists know that their claims must link chirality and autophagy to all biodiversity via the physiology of reproduction and supercoiled DNA.
See: Dobzhansky 1973 and precision medicine (6) in prep