Old Earth Creationist (OEC) Peter Berean, thinks I should change the claims in my model of energy-dependent biophysically constrained RNA-mediate protein folding chemistry. He does not like the fact that my model explains all pathology in the context of virus-driven energy theft.
If viral latency is not nutrient energy-dependent and controlled by the physiology of reproduction in species from bacteria to humans, I will change my claims. If someone explains what is wrong with my model, I will try to correct what is wrong. Until someone explains what is wrong with my model, here is the latest experimental evidence that validates my model, and an example of an attempt to discuss the model in the context of the evidence.
See the evidence: Opposing Effects of Fasting Metabolism on Tissue Tolerance in Bacterial and Viral Inflammation
Reported as: What you eat when you’re sick may determine if you’ll get better
My comment: I think it is obvious that energy-dependent healthy longevity is nutrient-dependent because nutrient-dependent RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions are linked to supercoiled DNA, which protects all organized genomes from virus-driven entropy (i.e., all pathology).
For discussion, see: James Kohl… if you would like to state your scientific hypothesis (re virus driven energy theft leading to pathologies etc) and its implications … please do so here.
James Kohl From the author’s comment on this article: http://comments.sciencemag.org/content/10.1126/science.1244730 “The major antigenic changes of the influenza virus are primarily caused by a single amino acid near the receptor binding site.”
Is there some reason you think I would be willing to do that based on your opinions and recommendations?
Darrell Mondeau James, serious scientists accept criticism of their models or hypotheses. It is important for the evaluation of the models or hypotheses. No scientific idea has ever moved forward without criticism and reevaluation.
And again, no offense meant.
Neo-Darwinian theory remains hypothesis free. The inventor’s claims were based on observations of change and statistics. They attributed the changes to “mutations” and natural selection. Darwin attributed the changes to “conditions of life.”
The fact that anyone would ask me to change a fully validated model of biologically-based cause and effect to something that was a better fit for ridiculous theories shows utter contempt for science and scripture. Darwin did not do that; neo-Darwinists always have.
Like the neo-Darwinists, you seem to hate the fact that experimental evidence of biophysically constrained energy-dependent RNA-mediated cell type differentiation supports claims that our ancestors chose to ignore the most basic of all constraints required for energy-dependent healthy longevity.
Is that a correct assessment of your current position on this debate? No offense meant. (September 28, 2016) Just now
Summary: Most theorists, atheists, and Old Earth Creationists (OEC) do not like my model of energy-dependent cause and effect. They have no alternative model and they seem to prefer theories. But they won’t tell me which theories they prefer, or why. They will not even cite a published work that they think supports their opinions.
See for example this description from a presentation by Kevin R. Foster: Social evolution in microbes: from model systems to the microbiome
Bacteria strains are often at war and we find that they can rapidly detect incoming attacks and respond in kind. Microbial interactions then follow the same evolutionary principles that were first understood through the study of animal behavior. However, one unusual and fascinating property of microbes is that an entire ecosystem can lie within another evolving organism: a host. This raises the possibility that hosts will act as ecosystem engineers that change the rules of microbial interaction for their own benefit.
See also: The evolution of cooperation within the gut microbiota, which was co-authored by Kevin R. Foster.
Cooperative phenotypes are considered central to the functioning of microbial communities in many contexts, including communication via quorum sensing, biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, and pathogenesis.
My comment: Nutrient energy-dependent pheromone-controlled quorum sensing links angstroms to ecosystems in all living genera via RNA-amino acid substitutions in supercoiled DNA. Nothing evolves, not the organisms in the gut, and certainly not the host. No organism of any species has ever evolved. The biophysically constrained energy-dependent physiology of reproduction prevents evolution. Virus-driven energy theft causes genomic entropy when energy-dependent RNA-mediated DNA repair can no longer protect the organized genome from virus-driven energy theft.