5th-6th Sept 2018 Dublin, Ireland

2018 March for Science vs microRNAs (2)

The anti-entropic virucidal energy of sunlight on contact with water has been linked from the creation of ATP synthase to the creation of ATP and to the creation of RNA. Energy-dependent RNA-mediated DNA repair has been linked to biophysically constrained viral latency via the creation of microRNAs and feedback loops linked to the food energy-dependent microRNA-mediated physiology of reproduction. The physiology of energy-dependent pheromone-controlled reproduction biophysically constrains viral latency in the context of the creation of the innate immune system and autophagy.
See: miRNA regulation of innate immunity (4/14/18)
None of the facts about the energy-dependent creation of the microRNAs or the microRNA-mediated regulation of innate immunity are included in: The Transcription Factor Runx3 Establishes Chromatin Accessibility of cis-Regulatory Landscapes that Drive Memory Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Formation (4/17/18)
The regulatory landscape that drive memory cytotoxic T lymphocyte formation might just as well be framed in the context of magic or in the equally ridiculous context of gene-centric theories.
See this report: Your immune system holds the line against repeat invaders, thanks to this molecule

Runx3’s control of T cell differentiation is important because when our bodies fight off viruses and cancers—and our T cells burst into action—the vast majority tend to become effector cells. These effector cells are short-lived and do not persist once the infection resolves.

The control of all cell type differentiation is energy-dependent, RNA-mediated and biophysically constrained by the physiology of reproduction in all living genera. The cell biology game “Cytosis” for ages 10+ teaches the facts that link Schrödinger (1944) What is Life? to Schrödinger at 75 – The Future of Biology – September 2018
In 1944, Schrödinger wrote:

Indeed, in the case of higher animals we know the kind of orderliness they feed upon well enough, viz. the extremely well-ordered state of matter in more or less complicated organic compounds, which serve them as foodstuffs. After utilizing it they return it in a very much degraded form -not entirely degraded, however, for plants can still make use of it. (These, of course, have their most power supply of ‘negative entropy’ the sunlight.)

See for comparison (this gene-centric pseudoscientific nonsense):
– Part I: FINDING THE CODE (Run time: 12:10
The race to sequence the human genome was also billed as a race to end disease. What happened?

– Part II: FIXING THE CODE (Run time: 13:07)
CRISPR — and the promise and pain of gene therapy that came before it. 

– Part III: SELLING THE CODE (Run time: 10:55)
Genetic testing has moved out of the labs into the masses. But even with your genome in hand, what can you believe?
The gene-centric pseudoscientific nonsense does not start with the creation of energy.  But every aspect of biophysically constrained life on Earth starts with the quantized energy-dependent creation of microRNAs. The epigenetically effected energy-dependent microRNA-mediated creation of the “Code” and the microRNA-mediated fixing of the “Code” is missing from the claims of biologically uninformed theorists who link beneficial mutations from natural selection to evolution. They have sold their gene-centric pseudoscientific nonsense to many people.
For example, some gene-centric biologically uninformed theorists share beliefs about abiogenesis for comparison to quantized energy-dependent microRNA biogenesis in articles like this: DNA Denaturing through UV-C Photon Dissipation: A Possible Route to Archean Non-enzymatic Replication

Many of the fundamental molecules of life, those common to all three domains; bacteria, eukaryote, and archea, including RNA and DNA, amino acids, enzymes, vitamins, cofactors, and protoporphyrins, absorb photons in the UV-C 1. RNA or DNA in complexes with these molecules act as acceptor quenchers, providing the electronically excited pigment donor molecule with an extremely rapid (sub picosecond) non-radiative dexcitation channel, through internal conversion into vibrational energy of the nucleic acid and surrounding water molecules2.

See John Hewitt’s comment: You have just described the founding principle and thermodynamic function of life
In a classic example of human idiocy (See Feynman: food energy), biologically uninformed science idiots linked the dissipation of quantized energy to the origin of life via abiogenesis. The creation of biophysically constrained biophotonicaly based life in the context of the energy-dependent creation of microRNAs was reported in the context of photon dissipation and entropy as: Abiogenesis: A Theory on The Origins of Life

By now, we all know how evolution works. At least, most of us have a basic understanding of how it functions. At its most fundamental level, evolution is change over time. More specifically, it is changes within a biological population over successive generations.

Ultimately, biological complexity is one of the most important things to come out of evolution. Things started simple. Then genes mutated, cells interacted with their environment, mitochondria stopped being living organisms and started being part of a cell and—Tada—complex life.

A conflict arose between John Hewitt’s accurate representations of biophysically constrained life in The vibrational theory of olfaction for the win  and few months ago, Hewitt blocked me from seeing his tweets.

The same kinds of amino acid substitutions that control the separations and interactions of side chains in fluorescent proteins also play an essential role in tuning the proposed mechanism for vibration detection—inelastic electron tunneling. Life literally runs on electron tunneling through the respiratory chain complexes in mitochondria. These proteins employ complicated mechanisms including esoteric-soundings things like electron bifurcation and confurcation to pump protons across the mitochondrial inner membrane. When mitochondria go dark, cells can often continue to run for a short while, but it is only in the dim glow of the battery backup metabolism.

Here are some links to the reason for the conflict. Simply put, John Hewitt put everything known to serious scientists about energy-dependent microRNA biogenesis back into the context of abiogenesis.
2005 MicroRNA biogenesis: coordinated cropping and dicing
2015 Dysregulation of microRNA biogenesis and gene silencing in cancer
2015 RNA-mediated degradation of microRNAs: A widespread viral strategy?
Claims about abiogenesis exemplify what Richard Feynman referred to as human idiocy. So does John Hewitt and anyone else who believes in Michaelian’s pseudoscientific nonsense.
See other examples of Michaelian’s pseudoscientific nonsense and human idiocy by clicking here.
The energy-dependent creation of one domain of life links the physiology of reproduction in bacteria to biophysically constrained viral latency. The virus-driven degradation of messenger RNA is linked to the destruction of all life on Earth.
The degradation of messenger RNA links mutations to the creation of archaea and L-forms via entropy, which clearly links the weakening of the proton motive force to the elimination of the cell wall in L-forms (the last remnants of creation).
See also: Past 5,000 years prolific for changes to human genome
If you cannot link the miRNA regulation of innate immunity to all extant biodiversity via the physiology of pheromone-controlled reproduction and fixation of energy-dependent microRNA-mediated amino acid substitutions, thank a biologically uniformed science idiot.


Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled autophagy (2)

See also: Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled autophagy

Autophagy: cellular and molecular mechanisms (2010)


… autophagy has emerged as a new and potent modulator of disease progression that is both scientifically intriguing and clinically relevant.

My comment: Autophagy is energy-dependent and linked to supercoiled DNA by epigenetic effects on the innate immune system, which are linked to the physiology of energy-dependent reproduction. If you think that the innate immune system automagically “emerged,” you might also think that autophagy has automagically emerged as the only known link from the epigenetic landscape to the physical landscape of supercoiled DNA in all living genera. Emergence and evolution are terms that theoretical physicists and neo-Darwinian theorists use to link what they don’t know anything about to fertilization and adult behavior.
See for comparison: From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior
Concluding sentence:

We see the primary contribution of this discourse, not to give answers but rather to broaden the scope of investigation. It would be helpful if some other investigators would similarly shed more light on a microanalysis of social-environmental factors impacting on sexual development.

My comment: Nutrient stress and social stress have repeatedly been linked to all pathology via their effects on hormones that affect behavior. Suddenly, 20 years after we published our review of epigenetic effects on RNA-mediated hormone-organized and hormone-activated behavior, RNA-mediated “… autophagy has emerged as a new and potent modulator of disease progression that is both scientifically intriguing and clinically relevant.”
What makes autophagy more relevant now than it was when Dobzhansky (1973) linked it from RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions to all biodiversity in Nothing in Biology Makes Any Sense Except in the Light of Evolution

For example, the so-called alpha chains of hemoglobin have identical sequences of amino acids in man and the chimpanzee, but they differ in a single amino acid (out of 141) in the gorilla (p. 127).”

See also: Non-coding portions of genome are found to play role in cancer

We now have an innovative way of destroying RNA targets inside live cells and assessing whether a tumor is dependent on them for survival,” says Spector.

My comment: Virus-driven energy theft has always been an innovative way to cause pathology in all cell types of all living genera. Biophysically constraining the virus-driven pathology has always been the key to healthy longevity and the survival of all species.
See: Substitutions Near the Receptor Binding Site Determine Major Antigenic Change During Influenza Virus Evolution
Author’s comment:

The major antigenic changes of the influenza virus are primarily caused by a single amino acid near the receptor binding site.

My comment: The authors responded to my comment, which was removed. It is still available here.

See also: “Substitutions Near the Receptor Binding Site Determine Major Antigenic Change During Influenza Virus Evolution”

The idea of biophysical constraints seems antithetical to the idea of nature somehow selecting mutations that cause amino acid substitutions. However, I am not a biophysicist or evolutionary theorist.

The problem may be my focus on nutrient-dependent receptor-mediated amino acid substitutions in species from bacteria to humans (non-viral organisms). Since I am not a virologist or physicist, I’m not sure that the laws of physics apply to viruses and their replication.

If they do, natural selection for random mutations is not likely to result in amino acid substitutions because the thermodynamics of changes in organism-level thermoregulation preclude such randomness. Stability of protein biosynthesis and degradation that probably depends on protein folding must somehow be controlled. Besides, I don’t know how random mutations in viruses could be naturally selected for inclusion in the human virome (or in the virome of any organism capable of thermoregulating its thermodynamic intercellular signaling).

If the Second Law of Thermodynamics does not apply to viruses, which means the chemical bonds that enable the amino acid substitutions can form at random and somehow be naturally selected, the details of biophysical constraints in this article seems out of place, since I do not think in terms of constrained random mutations and natural selection in mutation-driven evolution.

Hopefully, someone with a background in biophysics will address my confusion in case others are confused. In addition, I wonder if the consequences of understanding the evolutionary mechanisms that govern viruses extend to consequences important to understanding the evolution of species from bacteria to humans via constrained random mutations and natural selection?

See: ‘Game-changing’ immunotherapy doubles head and neck cancer survival

The survival benefit was more pronounced in patients whose tumours had tested positive for human papillomavirus (HPV). These patients survived an average of 9.1 months with nivolumab and 4.4 months with chemotherapy.

My comment: Testing positive for virus-driven energy theft in the context of pathology is not a game changer. It is an admission of negligence on the part of others who should have changed the game sooner. Game-changing immunotherapy links what is known about physics and chemistry to biology via molecular epigenetics. That fact should help all serious scientists who are still waiting to claim that all pathology is caused by viruses.
But the game change could have occurred much earlier so that more winners than losers would have survived during the past two decades. Long before the advent of the “game-changing” therapy, all pathology, includes the pathological behaviors that develop throughout life could have been linked to the pathological behaviors that pseudoscientists have been trained to exhibit in their claims about emergence and evolution.
For comparison, early detection of the virus that causes the pathology in a species-specific tissue type will be the obvious link to effective treatment and cures. Unfortunately, there is not much funding for preventative medicine and even less funding is dedicated to finding how specific viruses such as the Zika virus cause craniofacial deformities. Similarly, changes in the development of the brain are caused by virus-driven genomic entropy in species that have not yet become extinct.
Some researchers still seem to think that we can save other species from virus-driven genomic entropy and extinction despite the fact that no experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect suggests we can save humanity from a similar fate. All experimental evidence links what is know about behavioral development in one species to behavioral development in all species.
Behavioral development is nutrient-dependent and pheromone-controlled via the physiology of reproduction in all living genera. That fact and the claims of all serious scientists tells us approximately how far from extinction we may be. Not far enough.

See for another example of that fact: Behavioral development in embryonic and early juvenile cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis)

Abstract excerpt:

S. officinalis is well-suited to addressing questions of behavioral ontogeny. As embryos, they can perceive and learn from their environment and experience no direct parental care. A marked progression in learning and behavior is observed during late embryonic and early juvenile development.

From Fertilization to Adult Sexual Behavior was cited in Organizational and activational effects of hormones on insect behavior (2000) and cited in Nutrient-dependent/pheromone-controlled adaptive evolution: a model


Until recently, there was no direct evidence that human pheromones caused a definite behavior. In contrast, there was sufficient evidence to extend the mammalian model for epigenetic effects of nutrients and pheromones on GnRH and on hormonal organization and activation of behavior (Diamond et al., 1996) to invertebrates (Elekonich & Robinson, 2000). In that context, ‘From fertilization to adult sexual behavior’ (Diamond et al., 1996, p. 333) was extended to invertebrates with details from ‘egg to adult’ (Elekonich & Robinson, 2000, p. 1514).

My comment: How soon will the virus-driven energy theft that has been linked to the extinction of marine invertebrates and vertebrates be linked to the extinction of all terrestrial invertebrates and vertebrates?

See for example:  Past 5,000 years prolific for changes to human genome

Of 1.15 million single-nucleotide variants found among more than 15,000 protein-encoding genes, 73% in arose the past 5,000 years, the researchers report. 164,688 of the variants — roughly 14% — were potentially harmful, and of those, 86% arose in the past 5,000 years. More broadly, the results suggest that humans are carrying around larger numbers of deleterious mutations than they did a few thousand years ago. But this doesn’t mean that humans now are more susceptible to disease, says Akey.

My comment: Yes it does mean that humans now are more susceptible to disease. Only a theorist or someone who was equally biologically uninformed would make the claim that all humanity is not more susceptible to mutation-caused pathology than ever before.

The increasing number of deleterious mutations is killing us. Theorists have claimed that some mutations are beneficial because that claim supports their ridiculous theories.

See for comparison:

1) Role of olfaction in Octopus vulgaris reproduction

2) Olfactory organ of Octopus vulgaris: morphology, plasticity, turnover and sensory characterization

3) Neuroendocrine factors distinguish juvenile psychopathy variants

…two primary CU variants (aggressive and non-aggressive types) emerged with profiles characterized by low to average psychopathology and high DHEA levels. Findings contribute to a growing literature base suggesting that biomarkers may distinguish youth on separable developmental pathways to psychopathy.

See for comparison:
1) Phylogenetic plasticity in the evolution of molluscan neural circuits
2) The central pattern generator underlying swimming in Dendronotus iris: a simple half-center network oscillator with a twist
My comment: No experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect suggests that any central pattern generator “evolved” to link behavior to biophysically constrained energy-dependent RNA-mediated cause and effect. No experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect suggests that any mutation is beneficial.

See for comparison: A comprehensive transcriptional map of primate brain development


Disparate cell populations exhibit distinct developmental timing of gene expression, but also unexpected synchrony of processes underlying neural circuit construction including cell projection and adhesion.

My comment: Virus-driven energy theft alters the distinct developmental timing of gene expression in disparate cell populations, and the developmental timing of RNA-mediated gene expression is the only known link from RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions to supercoiled DNA, which protects all organized genomes from virus-driven entropy.

amino acid homeostasis

Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled autophagy

See also: Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled autophagy (2)

The Excitable Mitochondria links 4 neurons from a nutrient energy-dependent pheromone-controlled network in a marine invertebrate to human brain development via the conserved molecular mechanisms that link the speed of light on contact with water to the de novo creation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).  Receptor-mediated species -specific chromatin remodeling links chromosomal rearrangements to all biodiversity via energy-dependent chemotaxis and phototaxis.

See: The central pattern generator underlying swimming in Dendronotus iris: a simple half-center network oscillator with a twist.

See also: A quorum-sensing signal promotes host tolerance training through HDAC1-mediated epigenetic reprogramming

Reported as: Bacterial molecule trains the immune system to tolerate infection without inducing illness


More work needs to be done to understand the molecular mechanisms allowing this mutually beneficial adaptation of both host and pathogen…

My comment: More people need to learn what is known about how the energy-dependent de novo creation of G protein-coupled receptors is linked from RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions to cell type differentiation. Receptor-mediated behaviors link links the epigenetic landscape to the physical landscape of DNA via natural selection for codon optimality in the context of autophagy. Fixation of the amino acid substitutions in supercoiled DNA protects organized genomes from virus-driven entropy and all pathology.

SARCASM ALERT If I told you more about that, the information could get me killed, so… Never mind. Virus-driven pathology will kill you and everyone you love, instead.

— in memory of Robin Williams

Few researchers use sarcasm or humor to make their point, which mean that sometimes they don’t make it.

See for example: Endolysosomal trafficking of viral G protein-coupled receptor functions in innate immunity and control of viral oncogenesis

See also: Epigenetic regulation of G Protein Coupled Receptor signaling and its implications in psychiatric disorders

With no sarcasm or humor they linked everything known about G protein-coupled receptors to all healthy longevity compared to all virus-driven energy theft and all pathology.

For comparison: How is social “evolution” linked to all pathology without acknowledging the role of G protein-coupled receptor signaling in the context of the structure and function of receptors that link chemotaxis and phototaxis in all living genera? Are these researchers joking?

Chemotaxis: Social Evolution Selects for Redundancy in Bacterial Quorum Sensing

Phototaxis across kingdoms: Microbiology: Here’s looking at you, squid

Link to the innate immune system: A model symbiosis reveals a role for sheathed-flagellum rotation in the release of immunogenic lipopolysaccharide

Link to weekend evolution of the bacterial flagellum: Evolutionary resurrection of flagellar motility via rewiring of the nitrogen regulation system

My comment: Neo-Darwinian nonsense links nothing to anything. Resurrection of something means it existed before the resurrection. Therefore, what ever existed before must be linked from chemotaxis and phototaxis to its origins and to its resurrection. Instead, the researchers claimed that two amino acid substitutions were mutations, and they linked the mutations to the weekend evolution of a new flagellum.

For comparison, here’s a link to everything known about biophysically constrained RNA-mediated protein folding chemistry in all living genera:

Feedback loops link odor and pheromone signaling with reproduction

Here’s a link to delivery of a “billion dollar baby” RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering
Finally, here are some links from physics to chemistry and the molecular mechanisms that link nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled autophagy from RNA-mediated amino acid substitutions to supercoiled DNA, which protects all organized genomes from virus-driven energy theft and genomic entropy.
Press Release: The Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2016

See also: The tiniest Lego: a tale of nanoscale motors, rotors, switches and pumps

…they predict that the basic components of molecular machines will be used in diverse areas of science: as light-activated switches that can release targeted drugs, for example, or as smart materials that can store energy or expand and contract in response to light.

…the bonds could be readily formed and broken, much like zipping and unzipping the hydrogen bonds that link the two strands of DNA.

A plethora of other switches soon followed. Some were controlled with light or changes in temperature, whereas others worked by binding specific ions or molecules from solution, in a similar way to how ion channels work in cell membranes, opening or closing in response to chemical signals.

See also: World’s tiniest machines win chemistry Nobel


War Games: False Flag Terrorism

Sirius Cyantis (aka Sean Ovis) takes my claims about virus-driven energy theft and pathology outside the context of creationism.  Using his assumed name, he places them into the context of support for evolution. That’s an example of what happens on the “False Flag” Creationism FB group. In the context of combating evolution to fight disease, the war games become more interesting.

Most people in False Flag groups do not know who they are fighting against. In the end it won’t matter. Until then, let’s look at what serious scientists know about virus-driven energy theft, again. This is what the False Flag Creationism FB group has tried to prevent others from learning.

1996 (open access)


As silencing in both yeast and Drosophila is similarly enhanced by mutations in particular ubiquitin processing enzymes, the regulation of silencing by these enzymes appears to be an evolutionarily conserved process.

My comment: Serious scientists have linked angstroms to ecosystems via what is known about supercoiled DNA, which protects all organized genomes from virus-driven entropy.

For comparison to what is known, see:

2016 (open access)

Excerpt (with my emphasis):

…a mathematical model that is able to accurately estimate 5mC levels and the individual activity of the three main pathways relevant to DNA methylation dynamics (p1, de novo; p2, maintenance; and p3, active demethylation) and predicts with great accuracy corresponding 5hmC kinetics in all instances of global epigenetic reprogramming.”

My comment: Nutrient energy-dependent silencing via RNA-directed DNA methylation and enzymes linked to supercoiled DNA and protection of orgnaized genomes from virus-driven entropy now must occur via three pathways p1, p2, and p3.
p1, is the magical “de novo” pathway. (de novo means they don’t know how to link the energy-dependent pathway from angstroms to ecosystems).

p2, maintenance becomes part of something magical.
p3, demethylation also automagically occurs.

Leave out the energy-dependent biophysically constrained pathway. Start with magic. Stay with it. Leave out out everything known to serious scientists about virus-driven energy theft. What’s left is neo-Darwinism — the antithesis of creationism. Creationism – The Official Page may not be a False Flag group. See if you can tell the difference.

The differences remind me of the movie “War Games.” The game played by the computer was tic-tact-toe. The computer finally ended the simulated war by refusing to play.

Facts about who started the war and/or why computer models are still being used to combat creationism and promote ridiculous theories about mutations and evolution have never been addressed. The only thing certain is that — in the context of creationism — if you continue to play the evolutionist’s game, everyone loses.

Eventually,  virus driven energy theft kills everyone because viruses adapt faster that people do. The superbug crisis is proof of that. It’s the adaptation by viruses in the bacteria that is the biggest threat. Nutritional epigenetics points the way towards eliminating that threat.

See for comparison: Nutrient-dependent pheromone-controlled ecological adaptations: from atoms to ecosystems

Excerpt: (with my emphasis):

Researchers recently rediscovered a nutrient-dependent epigenetic variant that links vitamin C to what is probably a glucose and glucose dehydrogenase-dependent base pair change. The base pair change results in addition of a methyl group to a cytosine base, which takes on a hydroxyl group to form different 5-hydroxymethylcytosines (5hmCs). Different 5hmCs are associated with differences in cell types that have the same genetic backgrounds. Nutrient-dependent epigenetically-marked bases help to explain how hundreds of cell types in the human body and in the brain (Kriaucionis & Heintz, 2009) are differentiated and how they maintain their glucose-dependent and other nutrient-dependent receptor-mediated identities (Wu et al., 2014).

Comment: In this case the p1, p2, and p3 pathways are nutrient-dependent and receptor-mediated.

For example, calcitriol is the active form of vitamin D. Its effects on the microRNA(miRNA)/messenger RNA (mRNA) balance appear to protect against perturbed protein folding, which is associated with colorectal cancer. MiRNA-627 targets the mRNA that encodes an enzyme linked to histone demethylation and amino acid substitutions that increase stability of hydrogen bonds in DNA, which are important to protein folding (Padi, Zhang, Rustum, Morrison, & Guo, 2013). Rarely does a week go by without yet another report that details cause and effect in the context of miRNAs (Follert, Cremer, & Beclin, 2014). For example, the potential for therapeutic use of miRNA-126-5p to treat atherosclerosis was reported in time for me to note the importance of miRNAs to cell type differentiation via the circulatory system (Schober et al., 2014). However, in Section One, my focus is on the role of vitamins in nutritional epigenetics. The importance of the miRNA/mRNA balance to protein folding that enables structural and functional differentiation of cell types is detailed further in the Section Two of this review.

My comment: The importance of the link from virus-driven energy theft to pathology in the context of the Precision Medicine Initiative led to the National Microbiome Initiative.  5-hydroxymethylcytosines (5hmCs) link the p1, p2, and p3 nutrient energy-dependent pathways to cell type differentiation and protection of our organized genomes from virus-driven entropy.
Researchers in other countries know that. They will no doubt do everything possible to protect themselves and their countries from threats like the Zika virus and the Ebola viruses. For comparison, look at what happened in the United States of America.
1) Presidential candidate, Dr. Ben Carson was harassed for his young earth creationists beliefs.
2) PLOS one retracted an article for merely mentioning the Creator.
See: Biomechanical Characteristics of Hand Coordination in Grasping Activities of Daily Living [retracted]

In conclusion, our study can improve the understanding of the human hand and confirm that the mechanical architecture is the proper design by the Creator for dexterous performance of numerous functions following the evolutionary remodeling of the ancestral hand for millions of years. Moreover, functional explanations for the mechanical architecture of the muscular-articular connection of the human hand can also aid in developing multifunctional robotic hands by designing them with similar basic architecture.

My comment: What led to the attacks on Dr. Ben Carson’s religious beliefs? What led to the attacks on my scientific credibility in the FFCg?

These are the people who are playing the False Flag game with everyone:

Raymond Bane

Brandi Bell Fuller

Patrick Dennis

Dan Delane

Charles C. Hall, who plays as: Charles Blaha, Professor of Neurosurgery

Zachary Johnson

Dennis Jones

Jay Lutsky

Herman Mays

Sean Ovis  (as Sirius Cyantis, and too many of his friends to mention)

Christopher Richard Pruett
Dave Prout
Ryan Tipple
A few others deserve to also be mentioned, but first things first. Let them know you will try to stop them. Help other serious scientists who are Combating Evolution to Fight Disease, and help to restrain those who are fighting for the diseases that are destroying your security.
Alternatively, see: Comet contains glycine, key part of recipe for life May 27, 2016


In addition to the simple amino acid glycine, the instrument also found phosphorus. The two are key components of DNA and cell membranes.

My comment: Instead of combating evolution to fight disease you could fight against the reporting of pseudoscientific nonsense by theoretical physicists.
See: Scientific method: Defend the integrity of physics

…the issue boils down to clarifying one question: what potential observational or experimental evidence is there that would persuade you that the theory is wrong and lead you to abandoning it? If there is none, it is not a scientific theory. The imprimatur of science should be awarded only to a theory that is testable. Only then can we defend science from attack.

My comment: Substitution of achiral glycine in position six of the GnRH decapeptide in vertebrates links all energy-dependent RNA-mediated cell type differentiation from the innate immune system to supercoiled DNA and the stability of organized genomes via the physiology of reproduction. The theorists of physicists and evolutionists have not been supported with experimental evidence of biologically-based cause and effect. Many people have simply been taught to believe that the theories are scientific theories and they are the people that will continue to prevent scientific progress. They may allow virus-driven energy theft to kill us all.